​
646-378-4400 x127
BOND
  • Welcome
  • About
  • Practice Areas
    • Estate Planning >
      • Special Considerations for Unmarried Couples
      • Estate Planning Questionnaire
    • Probate & Estate Administration
  • Testimonials
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Contact

New, Invaluable LGBT Legal Resource Center from LeGaL

7/25/2011

1 Comment

 
For the past couple of years, I have been a member of the LGBT Bar Association of Greater New York, commonly known as LeGaL. The organization provides numerous services, including pro bono clinics that benefit low income members of the LGBT community. These clinics include a long-standing weekly clinic in Manhattan, a monthly clinic on Long Island, and a Life Planning Clinic (to which I volunteer my time), which is operated in partnership with the LGBT Law Project at the NY Legal Assistance Group. LeGaL accomplishes all this through the tireless efforts and exceptional skills of my friend and LeGaL's executive director, Brad Snyder, and his  dedicated volunteers and interns.

LeGaL's latest accomplishment--and the reason for this post--is its new LGBT Legal Resource Center, a clearinghouse of sorts for countless web resources covering a whole host of legal issues faced by the LGBT community, such as domestic violence, HIV/AIDS, family issues, transgender issues, immigration, and discrimination. It also includes an exhaustive list of organizations that serve the LGBT community (with links to their websites).  I am promoting the Resource Center here because I believe strongly that it will ease some of the information burdens experienced by members of the LGBT community who are trying to navigate legal issues. The Resource Center is well-organized, easy to use, and impressively comprehensive. I have never seen anything like it, and know it is the result of months of effort by LeGaL's staff and volunteers.

I invite you to have a look, and to pass the link along to anyone you know who might find it helpful or even just interesting to explore. It's absolutely free, doesn't require any kind of registration, and will almost certainly benefit anyone who seeks answers there.
1 Comment

Should Grandparents Have the Right to Visit their Grandchildren?

6/30/2011

2 Comments

 
In 2000 the U.S. Supreme Court decided a case that struck down a Washington state law that allowed any third party (in this particular case, grandparents) to petition for visitation rights with a child over parental objections. According to the Court, the right of parents to raise their children as they see fit is a fundamental right, and that this right includes the power to decide who can visit their children. The Court did not rule that a grandparent could never win the right to visit a grandchild, but did state that a parent’s wishes must be given extra weight and that it must be presumed that fit parents act in the best interests of their children.

Now, jump ahead a decade and shift your focus to New Jersey. In an effort to comply with the Supreme Court’s 2000 ruling, New Jersey law currently allows grandparents to petition for visitation rights, but the grandparent has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence (in other words, that it is at least slightly more likely than not) that denying grandparent visitation would harm the child. This sounds like a relatively easy burden to meet, but in reality many New Jersey grandparents have been denied visitation with their grandchildren because it is difficult to prove that lack of visitation will harm the child, especially if the grandparent has been unable to establish a relationship with the child because the child's parent refuses to allow visitation.

So yesterday the New Jersey legislature introduced a bill that would presumably make it easier for grandparents to win visitation rights. The bill provides that if a grandparent was once the child's full-time caregiver, that would be prima facie (self-evident, obvious) evidence that visitation is in the child's best interest, and would also consider that fact to be prima facie evidence of potential for harm if visitation is denied.

Under the bill, four other instances would also amount to prima facie evidence of both the best-interest and potential-for-harm standards: (1) if one or both parents is deceased; (2) if the parents are divorced; (3) if the grandparent demonstrates a past or ongoing close relationship with the child; or (4) if the grandparent has tried to establish a close relationship and the parents have refused to permit it.

If any of those circumstances exist (and, let’s face it, it’s not too difficult for a grandparent to meet at least one of those requirements), the court will be required to order one or more mediation sessions to attempt to resolve the conflict. If mediation does not resolve the conflict, the court will decide the visitation request based on factors such as the relationship between the child and grandparent, the relationship between the parents and the grandparent, and the time passed since the child's last contact with the grandparent. Notably, a court will not be allowed to consider the animosity between the parent and grandparent when making its decision.

Supporters of grandparent visitation rights welcome the proposed legislation. Others feel it undermines the fundamental right of parents to raise their children, and will not likely pass constitutional muster if enacted.

So what do you think? When if ever should a parent’s wishes with regard to grandparent visitation be disregarded? When if ever should grandparents have a right to visit their grandchildren even over the objections of the child’s fit parents?

2 Comments

    Archives

    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2015
    February 2015
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    November 2012
    October 2012
    August 2012
    March 2012
    January 2012
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011

    Categories

    All
    Adam Yauch
    Administrator
    Adult Children
    Advance Directive
    Agreements
    Attorney Ethics
    Baby Boomers
    Beastie Boys
    Beneficiaries
    Casey Kasem
    Children
    College
    College-aged Children
    Constitutional Rights
    Contracts
    Criminal Law
    Digital Assets
    Digital Estate
    Disposition Of Remains
    Do-it-yourself Legal
    Doma
    Domestic Violence
    Durable Power Of Attorney
    Estate Administration
    Estate Planning
    Estate Tax
    Estate Tax Exemption
    Evidence
    Executor
    Facebook
    Family Disputes
    Family History
    Family Law
    Faq
    Forum Selection Clause
    Gay Marriage
    Generation Skipping Tax
    George Jefferson
    Gift Tax
    Grandparents
    Gst
    Guardian For Minor Children
    Guardianship
    Health Care Proxy
    Heirlooms
    Heirs
    HIV/AIDS
    Immigration
    Incorporation By Reference
    Inheritance
    Intellectual Property
    Intestacy
    Irs
    Italian Cruise Ship
    Jurors
    Keepsakes
    Landlords
    Leases
    Legalzoom
    Linkedin
    Living Trusts
    Living Will
    Lost Wills
    Marital Deduction
    Marriage Equality
    Michael Jackson
    Music
    New Jersey
    New York
    New York Estate Tax Change
    Online
    Online Legal Resources
    Personal Representative
    Power Of Attorney
    Prince
    Probate
    Revocable Living Trusts
    Ron Paul
    Same Sex Marriage
    Same-sex Marriage
    Scalia
    Settling An Estate
    Sherman Helmsley Burial
    Social Media
    Sotomayor
    Supreme Court
    Surrogate's Court
    Tangible Personal Property
    Taxes
    Tenants
    Terri Schiavo
    Transgender Issues
    Trusts
    Twitter
    Unmarried Partners
    Violent Crime
    Visitation
    Whitney Houston
    Will Contests
    Wills

    RSS Feed

     

    These posts have been provided by the Law Office of Michael Bond for general educational purposes and do not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. For more information about the contents of these posts, or if you have any other estate planning questions, please contact Michael Bond at
    646-535-1529 or mike@michaelbondlaw.com.

Picture
DISCLAIMER: THIS IS ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. The information you obtain at this website is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. Review of this website does not in any way constitute legal representation. Contacting Michael Bond or the Law Office of Michael Bond by telephone, fax, e-mail, or any other method does not constitute legal representation, nor is any information you provide protected by attorney-client privilege until otherwise advised. Michael Bond, Esq., is licensed to practice in the states of New York and New Jersey, and this website is directed only to individuals or entities who may need legal information or representation in those two states.